Why Generative AI is Extremely Bad: Trees, Poems and People.
NOT a human brain (via Guru99.com) Making an artificial brain is NOT the same thing as what all marketing is calling "artificial intelligence," what is marketed as "AI" is an incredibly inefficient SQL severely limited by the absurd volume of data dumped into it AND the bottlenecking of generative software technique. Having scraped countless giga- if not terabytes of data to create images and text using a mere sentence or two is quite bad, but it is especially bad for visual art. NOT an SQL Server (via HopkinsMedicine) AND NOW IT'S TIME FOR A METAPHOR: If you wanted to create a generative AI that makes "trees," you can't just feed one tree into it, because it will just keep making variations on that one tree. You can't just feed one type of tree into either, because again, it limits its tree-generation ability. You have to give it as much variety as possible to get it to successfully generate a believable tree. Not a tree that's reali